|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |

Home Energy Magazine Online September/October 1996
letters
Average Rates Rate a Complaint
Here in the western United States we also have a
problem with "average" electric rates. (See "Where
Do Average Costs Come From?" Letters, HE July/Aug '96). The
average residential rate for our customers is only 6 cents/kWh. The problem
is that energy-saving products often show cost and payback information
based on higher rates. When customers don't see the promised reductions
on their bills, we hear about it. Packaging should include payback calculations
for several rates, so customers everywhere could have accurate information.
Thanks for the great magazine!
Carol Dollard
CEM Energy Services Coordinator
City of Longmont Electric Department
Longmont, CO
Call the COPs-HE Unfair to Heat Pumps!
Your March/April '96 article "Choosing
a Heating System That Saves Energy" (p. 27) underscores the difficulty
of comparing HVAC technologies. A focus on heating alone doesn't do the
comparison justice, when you consider that heat pumps don't just heat.
Further, the article is inaccurate and always tilts toward favoring gas.
The author says that one divides the HSPF by
3.413 to get a heat pump's seasonal Coefficient of Performance. By this
figuring, an air source heat pump just in compliance with US standards
(HSPF of 6.8) will have a COP of 1.99. Many air source units have significantly
higher ratings than this. Yet in Table 2 (p. 30) the article claims that
the "typical" seasonal efficiency of an air-source unit is 150% (COP of
1.5). Why not provide a range of efficiences, starting with the legal minimum,
as you did with just about every other technology?
Even worse, the article puts the "typical" seasonal
efficiency of a ground source heat pump at 260% (COP of 2.6). Again, this
is about the absolute worst one can do with this technology on a seasonal
basis. Most units sold have COPs well over 3, under an ARI test regime
that measures not seasonal, but winter peak performance. A 1993
EPA report found that standard ground source units with single-speed
reciprocating compressors operated at a seasonal efficiency of 275% or
better in the coldest U.S. climates, even taking into account the air handlers!
In warmer climates, seasonal efficiencies weighed in as high as 500% for
the best systems.
The panel "Integrated Systems for Space and Water
Heating" mentions only gas systems, neglecting to mention integrated air-
and ground-source heat pump systems that provide full-demand water heating.
You also never mention the fact that most ground source systems are installed
with desuperheaters, which can provide 15%-40% of a home's water-heating,
essentially for free. Ground source systems also heat water while cooling
the house.
Michael L'Ecuyer
Project Director
Geothermal Heat Pump Consortium Incorporated
Author Skip Hayden responds: I have nothing
against heat pumps. In fact, with low electric prices, new efficient heat
pumps can be an attractive option. I provided typical efficiencies of existing
equipment, not rated efficiencies of new equipment. Notice that the article
uses 60% as a typical efficiency for a gas furnace, although current standards
are much higher. Heat pump efficiency is complicated because colder climates
reduce efficiency. But a range-as we discussed in the heat pump section-may
have been more appropriate in the table. Converting HSPF to seasonal COP
is probably the most useful simple way to compare heat pumps to other heating
systems. New air source heat pumps generally have seasonal COPs of about
1.6-2.8, while new ground source heat pumps generally have seasonal COPs
of about 2.4-3.5. New technologies such as larger heat exchanger surfaces,
two-speed scroll compressors, and efficient variable-speed motor-fan sets
are continually moving the HSPF and COP upwards.
You make a good point about heat pump desuperheaters
used to heat water. They were left out of the section on integrated space
and water heating systems by an editing oversight, but are an excellent
application and improve the economics of heat pumps. I agree that cash
flow calculations can be beneficial in convincing people to purchase efficiency
measures, especially expensive ones like ground source heat pumps or even
high-efficiency condensing furnaces. However, simple payback calculations
are still useful for quickly comparing with other options.
Editor's note: Look for an article on ground
source heat pumps in the next issue of Home Energy.
Anode Quest and Questions
As a utility water heating specialist, I found the
Weingartens' article on water heating (May/June '96, p. 16) particularly
interesting. I have a few questions:
-
Where can one obtain replacement anodes, especially
the secondary type that fit in the hot water outlet port?
-
Can you really get anodes out of old tanks? (I thought
I would torque the welded fitting off the tank so I quit trying.)
-
Have you measured the additional energy use caused
by residential recirculation systems? (They seem popular in upscale houses.)
Russ Johnson
Northeast Utilities
Hartford, CT
Larry and Suzanne Weingarten respond:
Yes, anodes really can be removed from tanks without breaking the welds
or your ribs. Using a torque multiplier (a geared tool that trades speed
for force), we've removed hex head anodes from nearly two thousand tanks
without causing damage. The tool is expensive (around $400), but would
be worthwhile if you plan on changing multiple anodes. The combination
anode can be installed in the hot outlet with only a pipe wrench.
Locating replacement anodes can be as challenging
as removing them from tanks. Usually all you'll get at hardware stores
is a quizzical look. Even plumbing wholesalers may not have the anode you
need. These mail-order sources should be able to supply you:
Gull Industries. Tel: (800)748-6286
Water Heater Rescue. Tel: (510)945-6286
http://www.well.com/user/geant
We have seen no firm figures on recirculation
system energy use and believe there are too many variables to make such
figures very useful. Minimizing the time hot water is in piping reduces
opportunity for heat to escape, and the Metlund system addresses that need
well. Next best would be a thermostat- and timer-controlled system.
| Back to Contents Page
|
Home Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice

|