|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy Magazine Online November/December 1997
TRENDS
New Wall System Keeps
the Lead Out and the Heat In
The presence of lead-based paint in older multifamily
housing is a major public health concern. Dealing with these lead hazards
offers opportunities for improving not only the health of the occupants
but also the energy performance of the units, particularly when such efforts
are combined with energy conservation measures such as energy-efficient
windows and other building envelope improvements. A new composite wall
system developed by Oak Ridge and Argonne National Laboratories restricts
movement of lead dust and improves energy efficiency--and at a lower cost
than traditional framed walls.
Exposure to elevated levels of lead can cause
permanent mental handicaps and psychological disorders in children, as
well as hypertension and other maladies in adults. The potential for lead
poisoning exists in much, if not most, of the housing that was built before
1978. Studies indicate that in some urban communities with older housing
stocks, more than 35% of the children tested had elevated blood lead levels;
and nationwide, nearly 22% of black, non-Hispanic children aged one to
five living in housing built before 1946 had elevated blood lead levels.
Older housing stock contaminated with lead paint
frequently includes multifamily units located in structures with uninsulated
masonry walls. These structures often include two- and three-story walk-up
apartments, larger apartment complexes, and public housing (both high-rises
and townhouses). A history of heavy use coupled with moisture condensation
on the exterior walls causes paint on many of these walls to deteriorate
to the point that lead can freely enter the living space.
Looking for a low-cost solution, the Advanced
Housing Technology Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and
the Existing Buildings Efficiency Research Program at Argonne National
Laboratory (ANL) jointly developed a composite wall system that not only
encases the lead paint on wall surfaces but also adds a tight, well-insulated,
and durable interior surface to perimeter walls.
Wall System Materials
The wall system is made up of gypsum wallboard,
rigid foam insulation, adhesive to bond the components together, metallic
tape to seal joints, and wood nailers and fasteners to mechanically fasten
the top and bottom of the system to the existing masonry wall.
The development team chose Louisiana-Pacific
Fiberbond, 1/2-inch cellulose fiber-reinforced gypsum wallboard, for its
structural characteristics, impact resistance, and surface durability.
Its structural characteristics permit Fiberbond to be hung from the top
nailer of the system, which results in a straight, true wall.
Celotex Tuff-R accompanies the Fiberbond as the
rigid foam insulation. Tuff-R, a foil-faced, polyisocyanurate insulation,
provides the highest available R-value within the limited thickness of
1 1/2 inches dictated by horizontal 2-inch x 2-inch nailers. EnerFoam,
an easy-to-apply, quick-setting adhesive, bonds the insulation and wallboard
together. The adhesive is a one-component polyurethane foam with limited
expansion potential; no solvents are used that could destroy the rigid
insulation. The research team selected each of these materials because
it has properties that work well in the heavy-use environment of public
housing.
Wall System Construction
The Chicago Housing Authority (CHA), Louisiana-Pacific
Corporation, and Celotex Corporation undertook a collaborative effort to
demonstrate and field test this sytem. After building and testing a prototype
wall at CHA headquarters (materials and labor were provided by Louisiana-Pacific
and Celotex), the group constructed a composite wall system in one housing
unit at CHA's Brooks Development as a field test.
As a general rule, builders construct the wall
out of 1 1/2-inch Tuff-R insulation and 1/2-inch Fiberbond. The system,
installed on the inside face of exterior masonry walls, uses no vertical
studs or nailers and extends inward only 2 inches from the original wall
(Figure 1). Other retrofit insulation systems,
like conventional stud walls, consume 4 or more inches of living space.
Installers mechanically attach two nominal 2-inch
x 2-inch wood nailers horizontally to the original wall, at the floor and
at the ceiling. The nailers are sealed at the wall and at the floor or
ceiling with caulk or foam adhesive. Sealing prevents lead-contaminated
dust from migrating into the living space from under or around the nailers.
The installers trim a 4-ft x 8-ft sheet of rigid
foam insulation to fit between the nailers against the original wall. They
then attach the insulation to the original wall with the foam adhesive,
applying the adhesive in 1/4-inch beads about 12 inches apart. Metallic
tape at the seams of the insulation provides a continuous air and vapor
barrier and helps contain lead dust particles.
Next, installers attach the Fiberbond. For best
results, they first apply foam adhesive to the exposed surface of the rigid
insulation in 1/4-inch beads about 12 inches apart. Then they place two
1/4-inch thick shims on the floor in front of the bottom nailer. The installers
set the 4-ft x 8-ft sheet of Fiberbond onto the shims, offsetting the edge
of the Fiberbond from the edge of the insulation by 6 to 12 inches so the
seams will not align. This step strengthens the joint in the Fiberbond,
reduces the potential for air and moisture to move into the wall system,
and provides an additional barrier to contain lead dust. Six to eight drywall
screws mechanically attach the Fiberbond to the top nailer while the wall
board is being pressed into the adhesive. When the installers finally remove
the shims, the weight of the Fiberbond sheet causes it to straighten out.
The bottom is then attached to the lower nailer with three to four drywall
screws.
The joints of the Fiberbond and drywall screws
can be finished with standard tapes and drywall compounds. Standard painting
or wallpapering techniques, along with the installation of a wooden baseboard
or vinyl base cove, complete the installation.
 |
| Figure 1. Elements of composite wall construction.
(Foam adhesive is used between the gypsum board and the insulation.) |
System Costs
A comparison of the costs of this system with those
of a wood stud, fiberglass batt, and standard drywall installation, based
on R.S. Means Estimating Guides, suggests that the total installed
cost of the composite system is about 12% less. In the CHA field test project
(summer 1997), Fiberbond cost 35.5¢ per ft2 and Tuff-R
cost 60¢ per ft2. In more moderate climates, the substitution
of a less expensive, lower R-value, rigid foam insulation could reduce
initial costs while also reducing long-term energy consumption and costs.
Contractor estimates vary depending on the cost
of labor (geographic and union/nonunion variations) and the complexity
of the actual project (windows, doors, outlets, pipes, and so forth). The
Chicago installation, including base cover and painting, was estimated
to cost $4.20 to $4.90 per ft2 (1997 wages), based on professional
crafts installation. Given the simplicity of the system, resident labor
crews have the competency to install it in public housing developments.
The use of semiskilled or nonskilled workers would significantly reduce
labor costs while providing job experience for public housing residents.
--James Cavallo and Robert Wendt
James Cavallo is program manager for the Existing
Building Efficency Research Program at Argonne National Laboratory. Robert
Wendt is manager of Advanced and Industrial Housing at Oak Ridge National
Laboratory.
Source: Heather Hastings, John Knox, and
Helen Binns, Residential Lead Hazard Reduction: The West Town Lead Project.
(Chicago: 1997 Affordable Comfort Conference, April 1997).
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|