Home Energy Magazine Online - HomeEnergy.org
Welcome to Home Energy Magazine Online
Get instant access to the latest news on energy- efficient, durable, comfortable, and green homes.

Log in

Renew your Online Subscription
twitter @HomeEnergyMag
Home Energy Magazine Print Subscriptions
HOME ENERGY PRODUCTS Subscribe to our print and online issues.
Sign up for the E-Newsletter
Sign up for our newsletter
for special offers, news & updates.

EEBA

Efficiency First
HOME ENERGY BLOG
A Closer Look at Geothermal Heat Pumps

Henry Gifford is a man who designs mechanical systems for very energy efficient, comfortable, and affordable apartment buildings in New York City, along with his partner, architect Chris Benedict. In a recent article in Fine Homebuilding, Henry explained how geothermal heat pumps work in a way that I will always remember. I paraphrase:

Dig a hole in the ground. Put some buckets of water in the hole. If you are deep enough below ground, the temperature of the water in the buckets, after a while, will be about 550F. Take the bucket into your house and put it in your refrigerator. The fridge will cool the water down to say 500F, and the heat produced in the coils behind the refrigerator will add some heat to your house. Voila! You’ve created a geothermal heat pump.

Notice that the heat produced is not free. It takes electricity to run the refrigerator. And if you don’t want to spend your days hauling water in buckets from the hole in the ground to your refrigerator, you’ll want to install a water pump, which uses more electricity.

The very best residential geothermal heat pump system, according to Henry, has a coefficient of performance (COP) of about 3. This means that for every 2 watts of energy the system pulls from the ground, you have to provide only 1 watt of electricity. You get 3 watts out for 1 watt in. But a typical system has a COP of about 2.

Given that electricity is produced at power plants that use fossil fuels, and depending on the mix of fuels your utility uses to produce electricity, you will probably burn more fossil fuels using a geothermal heat pump with a COP of 2 than you would using an efficient gas- or oil-fired furnace. And geothermal heat pumps are much more expensive to install than traditional furnaces.

At Home Energy Magazine, where I work, we always tell people that if you have your house air sealed, insulated, and provided with the right amount of ventilation to keep you healthy, you can do better with a medium-efficiency furnace than you would with a high-end system—ike a high efficiency gas furnace—and a leaky house. For most of us, that’s the best choice of all, for heating and for cooling.

 
Add New Comment
Date & Time Comment By
07-23-2010
5:07:51 AM
Hi.
I have a small ground-up residence in Manhattan, KS.
Any suggestions as to where I might find the best help in choosing between a geothermal heat pump 
AND
radiant slab with solar water heat and small cooling units?

We are on the bubble as far as heating and cooling loads. I would like to keep the systems as passive as possible without getting into a lot of equipment and ducting, where I find a drawback to the geothermal approach- not to mention intial cost. Hope that makes sense.
THANKS
Mike Dudek
07-28-2010
7:31:09 AM
I agree with the stated approach of building a good thermal envelope with a boiler or furnace (or single space heater for super insulated house).  People however like heat pumps and I try to talk them out of using them.  I was wondering about the repair and maintenance of these units compared to standard heating systems? Allan Bullis
07-28-2010
12:05:45 PM

Hi Mike and Allan,

Thanks for writing in response to my post. I agree with Allan that the best way to go is to provide a tight, well insulated envelope with the right amount of ventilation and then go with a conventional efficient furnace and if needed an A/C system that is sized correctly. In a way, with a tight, well-insluted and well ventilated house, it doesn't matter so much where the heat or cool comes from. Anything with an efficiency of 80% or higher would do (that is an educated guess on my part not a professional opinion!)

An article in Home Energy a few years ago by Allen Zimmerman made a pretty good case for using electric baseboard heat, as long at the electricity to the baseboards was coming from a relatively clean source and not from a coal or oil fired power plant. I think arguments can be made for geothermal and radiant floor heat also. I just don't buy that they are nececarilly more efficent than conventional systems.

Mike, I'd suggest you get in touch with the folks at the Kansas Building Science Institute.

Alan, I don't know who to suggest you talk to about comparing the installation and mantainence of geothermal and conventional systems. But you might get in touch with Henry Gifford through his Web site.
Jim Gunshinan


While we will do our best to monitor Weblog activity for accuracy and relevancy, Home Energy is not responsible for content posted by third parties.
Back | View All Blogs
   
fluke
Archiexpo


Home | About Us | The Magazine | Products | Do-It-Yourself | Ask Us | Training Programs | Advertising | Links | Contact


Home Energy Magazine | 1250 Addison Street 211B Berkeley, CA 94702 | Phone: (510) 524-5405 | Fax: 510-981-1406
All of the materials in this service are copyrighted by Home Energy magazine. Any form of copying without express permission of the publisher, for other than an individual user's personal reference, is prohibited.
Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to: posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network,or in printed form.
Contact us for permissions, reprints, brochures & back issues.


Web Development & Hosting by Sleepless Media