Energy Modeling Versus Reality
A version of this article appears in the January/February 2010 issue of Home Energy Magazine.
January 06, 2010
Modeling software can be very useful for helping you understand how a building works. As I’ve described in previous articles, you can calculate heating and cooling loads, HVAC air delivery requirements, and duct layouts. You can tweak construction assemblies to your heart’s content to see, at least in theory, how a building’s energy consumption changes. You can change orientation and glazing to estimate the impact of various passive-solar strategies. The combinations of variables are endless. Underlying this process are usually complex algorithms based on research done by dozens of well-respected researchers from some of the most prestigious institutions in the world. The key question is, How well do these modeling programs reflect reality? After all, if we want to predict the effect of a change to a building, we have to know exactly how that change affects the building’s energy consumption. This question raises a variety of issues. First, you have to decide how to measure reality. That’s usually done in some standardized unit, such as kWh for electricity or thermsmfor natural gas. However, there may be other useful metrics—daylight penetration, occupant comfort, humidity levels, temperature changes, room-by-room ...
To read complete online articles, you need to sign up for an Online Subscription.
The Home Energy Online articles are for personal use only and may not be printed for distribution. For permission to reprint, please send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.